Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List - SAP for Public Sector
Viewing all 3504 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

How to handle large & complex legacy batch based processes moving to a SAP solution

September 18, 2013, 6:24 pm
$
0
0

Hi Everyone,

 

There is some healthy discussion at work currently on how we go about efficiently meeting our current legacy interface based processing whilst re-platforming in SAP technologies (using Public Sector Social services CRM/ERP/PSCD/PO/BRF+ etc).

 

It is expected that a number of our existing external interfaces cannot change within the timeframe for our initial SAP system deliverable. These interfaces are based on large daily files (containing up to tens of thousands of transactions each) traditionally received & processed, or generated & sent by our legacy system overnight outside of our 9AM-5PM business-facing application window.

 

Also the processing of the transactions in these files (3rd party customer information, re-assessments for benefits, payments, letter processing etc) can be quite complex requiring many data accesses/validations/calculations to cater for retrospective calculations and flow on affects to changes to related Business partners etc. There is also a high level of dependencies on these legacy batch processes based on a sequential style pattern of execution (i.e. batch 1 runs & complete, then batch 2 runs and completes, then batch 3 etc).

 

So the question is how have other organisations in similar situations tackled this problem but still performed? What sort of tips, techniques, technologies could help stand up, what problems should we aware of? We know about SAP HANA already and hope to use it to help with tuning data accesses.

 

Sorry its a bit of an open-ended question and we are only recently newcomers to all things SAP so open to any suggestions.

 

cheers
Gary

↧
Search

Account Assignment to commitment Item not supported with the G/L Account

September 19, 2013, 2:15 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

I am getting the below error while executing VI02 transaction Code - Change Shipment Cost.

 

"Account Assignment to commitment Item not supported with the G/L Account"

 

The GL Account is Transporation cost which is subject to AVC Check with 30/3.

 

I maintained Commitment Item both in FS00 and FM Derivation rules also, but still getting Error.

 

Please help me on this.

 

Regards

Sam

↧
↧

Re: FM- Cut Over Activities

September 19, 2013, 5:20 am
$
0
0

Hi All,

 

I am doing FM implementation for one of our clients and its in the mid of the year. My client wants the system to show consumed budget for the whole year, i.e. YTD. For example, go live date is in 1st week of October so for April to September (FY is Apr to March) whatever budget is being consumed it should be uploaded in the system as a part of cut-over activty so that the report can show correct YTD numbers. I searched all SCN posts but couldn't find answer to this. Please help. If there is any existing link please share as I couldn't find one.

 

Regards,

Santoshi

↧

Re: Budget control period wise as well as Year wise

September 20, 2013, 2:14 am
$
0
0

Hi Mani,

 

Thanks for your input,

 

We are using ECC 6.0 only, is Period wise budget control supports in standard.

 

Regards,

Ramakrishna

↧

Re: Provision Entries posting without Budget Check

September 20, 2013, 3:10 am
$
0
0

Hi Rao,

 

How did you solve this issue? I also have similar requirement.

 

Regards,

Santoshi

↧
↧

How to restrict with DUMMY in FMDERIVE for KO88 / MR21

September 20, 2013, 5:22 am
$
0
0

Dear Experts,

 

Please suggest

 

I want to restrict budget check for the following transactions

 

1. During the KO88 settlement for Plant Maintenance Orders, i.e. transferring cost from the PM Order to Cost Center, system is expecting Commitment item, how to restrict this transaction with DUMMY in FMDERIVE

 

 

2. MR21 for the materials revaluation also expecting the Commitment item, how to restrict this transaction with DUMMY in FMDERIVE

 

 

Regards,

Upendar Singh

↧

Re: How to restrict with DUMMY in FMDERIVE for KO88 / MR21

September 20, 2013, 5:57 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

All these actions must have a specific business transaction and /or document type. So, based on this information ,as both of these fileds are part of FMDERIVE structure, you can build a rule deriving DUMMY commitment item.

 

Regards,


Eli

↧

Re: How to restrict with DUMMY in FMDERIVE for KO88 / MR21

September 21, 2013, 6:14 am
$
0
0

Dear Eli,

 

Sorry for late reply

 

Thank you for your reply

 

As per your suggestion for MR21  I can write derivation based on the Document type,

 

For KO88, I can't see any business transaction in the Document header, and during settlement it is updating with SA document type.  The same document type (SA) we can't use for DUMMY as there are other direct postings against this G/L account in FI

 

Please suggest

 

Regards,

Upendar Singh

↧
Search

Re: Budget at Department and Location level

November 13, 2013, 11:04 pm
$
0
0

Hi Eli,

 

I do not understand why we need to create two AVC ledgers? Because i created one more derivation rule with override condition as follow :

 

If GL is 7000400110 with cost centre 9800505050 then pick fund centre LOCATION.

 

for others pick Department as regular.

 

is there any issue in long run if i define this way.

 

i checked and this is working very fine.

 

Regards

Zunaid

↧
↧

Re: Budget at Department and Location level

November 14, 2013, 1:21 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

I didn't say you should. I said that you had to defined it only if you want to check the budget on BOTH levels simultaneously. From your last description, I understand that it's not the case; the budget will be checked EITHER on department or location level. But, in this case, I don't understand what kind of difference you encounter with...

 

Regards,

 

Eli

↧

Re: Budget at Department and Location level

November 14, 2013, 1:38 am
$
0
0

Hi Eli,

 

Sorry for mis communication.

 

In my case GLs are different. FOr eg. Salary GL 7000010101, Professional feels GL 7000020202. Rent GL GL 7000030303 are to be budgeted at Location level.

 

Remaining all GLs other than above are to be budgeted at Department level.  I think this give clear idea.

 

So i will create one more derivation rule for location budget. I have defined regular budget at department level with 2 derivation rule. 1. GL to Commitment 2. Cost Centre to Fund Centre.

Here i have given all GLs and cost centres.

 

Now 3 rule is overriding rule, where if you find any salary, profession or rent GL with combination of so and so cost centre than use Location fund centre (budget).

 

Please let me know if this is ok.

 

Regards

Zunaid

↧

Re: Budget at Department and Location level

November 14, 2013, 2:07 am
↧

Re: Budget at Department and Location level

November 14, 2013, 2:29 am
$
0
0

Hi Eli,

 

Okk. Thank you so much for help.

 

Regards

Zunaid

↧
↧

Re: FMMPCOVR dump too many FM accounts assignments selected

November 15, 2013, 12:35 am
$
0
0

Hi Christelle,

 

Normally, the system should handle such an amount. Did you try to split your population by fund source, for example, and carry-over the budget in parts?

 

Regards,


Eli

↧

Re: SAP HR - Funds Management Integration

November 16, 2013, 2:09 pm
↧
Search

Re: FM budget checked again in MIRO

November 16, 2013, 2:30 pm
$
0
0
Hi Sanjay, as Eli sayd,  I also think you need to re-post  the documents even if the IR is not active in OFUP, and for your specific scenario have a look at the following notes

Note 1633190 - FMN0 Error FI057 For GR Document From SES

 

Note 1638951 - FMN0 FLG_SKIP_FOR_SES For SES Created Without FM Active

 

 

And maybe the note 1146677 - Service Entry Sheet FM account assignment inherited from PO

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards

César

 

 

 

↧

Re: FM BCS - Budget Exceed mail alters to External mail Box

November 18, 2013, 1:55 am
$
0
0

   method IF_EX_FMAVC_EVENT~MODIFY_MAIL_RECIPIENTS.

TYPES:      BEGINOF TY_ITAB,
            w_email type ADR6-SMTP_ADDR,
            ENDOF ty_itab.



DATA: l_f_receiver LIKELINEOF c_t_receivers,
      ITAB TYPETABLEOF TY_ITAB,
      WA_ITAB type TY_ITAB,
      w_bname type XUBNAME,
      w_email type ADR6-SMTP_ADDR,
      adrn type USR21-ADDRNUMBER,
      pers type USR21-PERSNUMBER.

READTABLE c_t_receivers INDEX1INTO l_f_receiver.

w_bname = l_f_receiver-receiver.

     selectsingle ADDRNUMBER from USR21 into ADRN where BNAME = w_bname.

     selectsingle PERSNUMBER from USR21 into PERS where BNAME = w_bname.

     selectsingle SMTP_ADDR from ADR6 into w_email where PERSNUMBER = PERS and ADDRNUMBER = ADRN.


l_f_receiver-receiver = w_email.
l_f_receiver-rec_type = 'U'.

append l_f_receiver to c_t_receivers.

endmethod.

 

Try this now the system will trigger external mail.

 

PS: Email should be maintained for the user who is responsible for Fund center.

↧
↧

Re: Message and Event Control for Tolerance Profiles ?

November 18, 2013, 2:02 am
↧

Derivation of Fund a/c assignment object fund from other modules

November 20, 2013, 5:43 am
$
0
0

Dear Experts,

 

I am configuring FM (BCS) for version ERP 6 (Less than EHP4) for which I have configured period-wise budgeting through Account assignment object Fund (each period as one fund).  I am stuck in the step of deriving A/c assignment object especially Fund for the flow of data from the following components of HR Payroll, Travel Management &  Asset Accounting.

 

In addition, CO transactions are not relevant for my Fund Management.  Since it is asking for Fund in my CO Assessment/Distribution cycles etc, I have unticked the Fund in SPRO>General Settings for Public Sector Management>Basic Settings: Account Assignment Elements>Activate Account Assignment Elements.  By doing so, the Fund field was removed from all the cycles and it is ok from CO part.

 

My real problem is how should I derive the "Fund" account assignment object for the data flowing from these modules of HR Payroll, Travel Management &  Asset Accounting with the above customizing in place or kindly mention any other workaround for the same.

 

 

Regards,

 

Vara

↧

carry forward residual balance

November 20, 2013, 7:45 am
$
0
0

Dear Experts,

while performing budget carry forward in funds management through "FMMPCOVR" the system gave me no error but revenue for funded program was also carried forward to next year which is wrong. can any one tell me how i could stop it from happening and also how could i reverse the one for which revenue has already been carried forward.

 

Regards,

↧
Viewing all 3504 articles
Browse latest View live
Search