Hi Eli,
Thank you .I will try this with new parameters for derivation of fund source.
Thanks,
Kittu
↧
Re: Budget Mapping Question
↧
Re: Contract account replication from CRM to PSCD for SAP Social services
Hi Anwesha
I'm solution manager for SAP Social services solution and here are some info.
To create a CA or its equivalent in CRM Business Agreement, and to replicate it in ERP is not necessary in our Solution.
Of course you are right CA is necessary in PSCD.
The creation of Contract Account and if necessary Contact Object is done when you approve, for the first time, a Social Service Plan (SSP) requiring these master data.
The contact account category is defined via SSP payment family customising in ERP.
The creation of the master data itself is triggered in ERP via BADI: PSSC_ACC_MD_CREATE.
If you didn't create you BP in CRM with role Sold to Party (It is not mandatory) the role MKK mandatory to use CA in ERP will be assign then to you BP.
The last step regarding PSCD integration is the generation of billing documents from social net calculation documents.
This is done using transaction PSSC00_Billing. in ERP.
In this transaction, determination of billing information:
• Header level:
o External document type for billing documents
• Item level:
o Company code
o Transaction
o Subtransaction
Using BADI: PSSCB_BILL_CREATE will be passed to billing documents
I hope it helps
Best regards
Hervé Bourne
Solution Manager, IBU Social Services
↧
↧
Re: Contract account replication from CRM to PSCD for SAP Social services
Hi
Hervé Bourne ,
Thanks a lot for your reply. It was very helpful.
Regards,
Anwesha.
↧
Restricting the user from withdrawing more than consumable budget
Hi,
We are using budget period and we have process related issue here:
We upload the budget for future budget periods as well.
And when the budget for a combination of funds center, commitment item, fund is exhausted in the current budget period we will borrow it from future budget period. By borrowing I mean manually posting minus budget for the combination and posting the same amount to the current budget period.
For example: Budget is exhausted for Funds center 100 and commitment item A in the current budget period, and we have uploaded 10000 into next budget period, we will post minus budget for the required amount in the next budget period and upload it to current budget period through FMBB.
The issue here is if consumable budget for next budget period is 10000 and if we post -11000 also system will accept resulting in consumable budget for next period to be -1000, we do not want it to go below zero. system should restrict posting negative only until consumable budget is zero.
Please help me with this
Regards,
Insomniac
↧
Re: Restricting the user from withdrawing more than consumable budget
Hi,
The budget control is performed on annual level. Only if you use 'Budget Period' as FM object and not just like a calendar period, you can achive what you require.
Regards,
Eli
↧
↧
Re: GL account linkage with activity group for AVC- Funds management
Hi, Eli,
I am looking for solution how to prevet negative postings during FMBB, if budget available amount is less then amount, which is entering.
(I posted my question: http://scn.sap.com/thread/3460746)
Does activity groups could be solution?
BR,
Kristina
↧
Re: Consistency Check required on FMBB
Hi Ming:
I achieved this without consistency check. In FMOPER i maintained fund wise period assignment i-e for OPEX-JUL i maintained 01 against this fund in FMOPER and so on. This let me achieve my purpose. Now one can not simply select period 01 and put OPEX-MAY or any other fund than OPEX-JUL or CAPEX-JUL 
.
Regards
↧
Re: Rolling budget in FM
Hi Ming:
As of today using object Fund for periodic budget posting and reporting has worked fine for me. For FI and MM postings it is working fine. Picking up fund dimension based on the date of transaction which gets filled in every FM related transaction no matter which module it relates to so this suffice our purpose of reporting .
Regards
↧
Activation of PSGLFLEXT Table in PSM
Hi All,
I am new to PSM, in our present client requirement there is scope for Fund Accounting and Cash Basis Accounting.
Present system is SAP ECC6-EHP4. I am going to implement SAP Best Practice-PSM.
I need to activate the PSGLFLEXT instead of using FAGLFLEXT and FMGLFLEXT.
In the existing system, there is some data in the table FAGLFLEXT. But we do not want to include any customer fields in FAGLFLEXT table & FMGLFLEXT.
This requirement is only to activate PSGLFLEXT table.
Please provide your valuable inputs - how to activate and use PSGLFLEXT table.
I have gone through all related OSS notes, but not clear which note or program has to be used to activate from FAGLFLEXT to PSGLFLEXT.
Best Regards,
Subhash
↧
↧
Re: Multiple FM areas for multiple company codes
Hello
There will be few complications if you have multiple FM area e.g. inter-company entries will not be posted.
Also as Eli said if you want integration with CO then controlling area should be defined at FM area level.
Instead you can define each company code as fund and maintain budget accordingly.
Regards,
Sangram
↧
Re: Key Figure for Fund related consistency check in FMBB
Hi Atif,
You can use any key, which calculates the budget. In your consitency check you set as pre-requisites the 'incorrect' combinations and check that the key figure is equal zero; otherwise, issue an error.
Regards,
Eli
↧
Re: Key Figure for Fund related consistency check in FMBB
What is the prerequisite in your consistency check rule? I can make prerequisite like this:
( Commitment Item = '11111111' OR Commitment Item = '22222222' OR Commitment Item = '33333333' ) AND Fund = 'OPEX'
But in that case I would rather create a budget structure.
↧
Re: Multiple FM areas for multiple company codes
Thank you guys for the info.
The client is setup to provide budget control via commitment item master data to some extent. The tolerance derivation strategy will check the commitment item type in the master data. If it is filled, the object is exempt from budget check. There are also controls by CI and FC hierarchies.
Each affiliate of the client would like to exempt/control commitment items without affecting other affiliates/company codes. Since commitment items/funds centers/hierarchies are assigned at FM area level, we opted to create separate FM area for each company code.
However, they are all using the same controlling area and the same chart of accounts. Each company will have a different range of cost centers/funds centers.
↧
↧
Re: We can't see Purchase orders open items' amount value...
Are you using Former Budgeting or BCS? FMRP_RFFMEP30X is for Former Budgeting; FMB_PL01 is for BCS.
↧
Re: Multiple FM areas for multiple company codes
Hi,
In your scenario, I don't see split of FM areas as a good idea. You will have much more disadvantages than benefits. You can manage your budget control via derivation strategies.
Regards,
Eli
↧
Error during Invoiced Receipt Service related PO - FM report not updated
Hi I've encountered an error during Invoiced receipt Service related PO with Fund Management updating its report.
It didn't update FM report. on Invoiced side its only update the reducing commitment on the PO level only.
For example :
Now the issue is :
I have a budget - RM2000.
I create a PO - RM1000
My budget balance is - RM1000
Then because of the bugs i do the GR/IR for the PO - RM1000
and the consumption become 0 ( Because this is the error happening
during
GR/IR.)The error that system do before implementing the notes for
correction:
Steps 1 : ( During PO)
Budget : RM2000
PO : RM1000
Budget Balance : RM1000
Steps 2: ( During GR & IR)
Budget : RM2000
PO : RM1000
PO : -RM1000
GR/IR : 0 ( The system does not include in Invoice receipt in the
report
the system only minus the commitment created in PO but didnt add the
actual during IR,
Budget Balance :RM2000
So when this happen user tend to create another PO RM2000
means that it should hit budget already as the total PO is already
RM3000
where else the budget is only RM2000.
We did refer to Correction note 1289547 - Service entry sheet.
We try to apply with SNOTE function but, around 60+ prerequisite notes need to be applied.
This is because our SP is 008 and current now is 24. Our SP last updated in 2007.
So we ask the Abapers to apply it manually.
It seems working in DEV, but once we transport it to PRD,
it didnt work. What is your guys opinion, do we need to upgrade support package, or we till try to implement the notes manually ?
↧
Error Tcode F111 - Account assignment change during document creation.
Hi, I've encountered and error in Tcode F111 - Automatic Payment Transaction for Payment Request
Account assignment change during document creation.
Account assignment change during document creation
Message no. FMUP127
Diagnosis
Changes to FM account assignments during the event PROJECT causes variances between Funds Management and all other components activated in the system. Financial Accounting in particular is affected. This can lead to follow-up costs being updated using incorrect account assignments.
Procedure
Use transaction FMDERIVE to change the derivation of the FM account assignment so that, as early as the RWIN-event CHECK (which occurs before document creation in all components), the correct account assignments can be derived and it is subsequently no longer necessary to overwrite them.
Our Release is 605
SP level - 0006
Support package - SAPK-60506INEAPS
I already tried read notes:
1585187
1509206
1562938
but seems not related even the error msg is the same.
Any body encountered this before please help.
↧
↧
How to post multiple profit center in customer account at the time of Payment Receipt in F-28.
How to post multiple profit center in customer account at the time of Payment Receipt in F-28.
We need to post the below entries:-
Bank A/c Dr. 150 Profit Center 1
To Customer 1 A/c Cr. 50 Profit Center 2
To Customer 2 A/c Cr. 50 Profit Center 3
To Customer 3 A/c Cr. 50 Profit Center 4
We do not want to enter profit center in any of the free flow text field.
Thanks,
Sarvendra Negi
↧
Cancelled grant reference on PO line item
We are trying to reduce amounts on a complete PO for line items that are not grant related. The line itmes referencing the cancelled grant is affecting the action taken and not allowing the change to the non-grant line items. Similar error on Note 1069639 is not applicable to our system. We are running release 606 EA-PS. The lifecycle status cannot be changed on the grant to allow the changes. Looking for help from the community.
↧
Re: We can't see Purchase orders open items' amount value...
Hi Guys,
We figured out this problem. It was about an new development. Our MM groups developed a new adaptation, "Release Strategy". We couldn't see amount value because we didn't change status of PO. After we changed it, we could see it.
Thank you for interest.
Regards,
İhsan
↧